Monday, June 23, 2003

That Didn't Take Long

Remember Lamert's post about NGO's refusing contracted work rather than submit to Bush administration's unprecedented view that if they're on the ground in Iraq, they belong to Bush & co? Remember Tresy's post about the AEI's worries about the unprecedented power of NGOs. Think there might be a connection between these two phenomenon?

Naomi Klein writing in The Guardian puts it all together for us:

The war on NGOs is being fought on two clear fronts. One buys the silence and complicity of mainstream humanitarian and religious groups by offering lucrative reconstruction contracts. The other marginalises and criminalises more independent-minded NGOs by claiming that their work is a threat to democracy. The US Agency for International Development (USaid) is in charge of handing out the carrots, while the American Enterprise Institute, the most powerful think-tank in Washington, is wielding the sticks.

....

These days, NGOs are supposed to do nothing more than quietly pass out care packages with a big "brought to you by the US" logo attached - in public-private partnerships with Bechtel and Halliburton, of course.

That is the message of "NGO Watch", an initiative of the American Enterprise Institute and the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies that takes aim at the growing political influence of the non-profit sector. The stated purpose of the website, launched on June 11, is to "bring clarity and accountability to the burgeoning world of NGOs". In fact, it is a McCarthyite blacklist, telling tales on any NGO that dares speak against Bush administration policies or in support of international treaties opposed by the White House.

Read the whole thing. What the Bushies are doing here is unheard of. Now, if we could only get some American media coverage....