NYT colleagues reax to Mueller:@adamgoldmanNYT:
— Trip Gabriel (@tripgabriel) July 24, 2019
So far, this hearing is not revealing new ground...By tomorrow it could be forgotten in this frenetic news cycle.@maggieNYT:
Adam, I think you’re being generous with “by tomorrow.”
On the one hand, Mueller stated incredibly damning things under oath, on the other he didn't sing them in a rich, deep vibrato. https://t.co/BXkwzY4QC8
— Brian Beutler (@brianbeutler) July 24, 2019
To be fair, even the pee tape wouldn't have qualified as a Sorkin Moment because nothing does.
Journalism, how the fuck does it work?
The perennial belief that we can dictate what people should care about instead of reporting on the news... https://t.co/uvNzO8ryt8
— Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) July 24, 2019
By "people" Maggie means "her and her friends" because the New York Times does not have brain implants in the population signalling back to them what you care about.